Who Moved My Cheese? Lessons for Credit Card Processing
Has your business outgrown its payment processor? Explore lessons from Who Moved My Cheese? and discover how smarter payments can improve cash flow.
Presented by Allen Kopelman, CEO — Nationwide Payment Systems-Host of B2B Vault: The Biz2Biz Podcast
AI Overview
Businesses should not change processors just for the sake of change, but they should regularly reassess whether their payment strategy still supports their current size, customers, cash flow, and growth plans. It positions Nationwide Payment Systems and NPSONE Smart Invoicing as solutions for smarter payment processing, automated billing, ACH, integrations, and improved accounts receivable workflows.
sponsored by
Who Moved My Cheese? What Business Owners Can Learn About Credit Card Processing and Adapting to Change
By Allen Kopelman, CEO & Co-Founder, Nationwide Payment Systems
The most expensive words in payment processing may be, “We’ve always done it this way.”
For years, a business can use the same merchant account, the same credit card processor, and the same billing procedures without giving them much thought. Payments come in, deposits arrive, and the monthly statement gets filed away. Why change something that appears to be working?
But businesses are evolving. Sales volume increases. Customers begin using different payment methods. Accounting systems change. Invoices become more complicated. What made sense when a company processed $100,000 a month may not be the best solution when it processed $1 million or more.
That is where Spencer Johnson’s business classic, Who Moved My Cheese?, offers a useful lesson.
The book uses a simple parable about four characters navigating a maze in search of cheese. When their familiar supply disappears, each responds differently. Some recognize the change and move forward. Others resist, hoping things will return to the way they were. The story is ultimately about recognizing change, overcoming fear, and adapting to new circumstances. (PenguinRandomhouse.com)
For business owners, the lesson is especially relevant to payment processing: the solution that helped you grow may not be the solution that helps you reach the next stage.
Your Payment Processing Cheese Has Moved
Imagine a wholesale distributor that started with a few employees and a modest customer base. When the company opened its merchant account, it selected a simple flat-rate payment provider. The pricing was easy to understand, setup was fast, and the business did not need sophisticated integrations.
At the time, it was a sensible decision.
Ten years later, the company is processing $2 million a month. It has a larger sales team, hundreds of commercial customers, and an accounting department handling a growing volume of invoices. Corporate purchasing cards represent a meaningful portion of sales, and customers increasingly want the option to pay by ACH.
Yet the company is still using essentially the same payment strategy it adopted when it was much smaller.
The owner says, “Our processor works. Why would we change?”
That is the payment-processing version of returning to the same spot in the maze and expecting the cheese to be there.
The problem is not necessarily that the original processor was a bad choice. The problem is that the business has changed while its payment strategy has remained the same.
Meet the Four Characters in Your Accounting Department
In Who Moved My Cheese?, Sniff, Scurry, Hem, and Haw represent different responses to change. Their approaches translate remarkably well to the decisions business owners make about payments.
Sniff: The Owner Who Notices Change Early
Sniff represents the ability to recognize that something is changing before it becomes a crisis.
In payment processing, Sniff is the business owner or CFO who notices that processing fees are increasing as sales grow, more customers are paying with commercial cards, accounts receivable is taking longer to collect, or employees are spending too much time manually reconciling payments.
Instead of waiting for a problem, this owner asks, “Is our current system still the right fit for the business we have today?”
That question can uncover opportunities to improve pricing, automate billing, or offer customers more payment choices.
Scurry: The Business That Takes Action
Scurry represents action. Once a change is recognized, the company begins exploring solutions rather than remaining stuck in analysis.
For a merchant, that might mean requesting a processing statement review, comparing pricing models, evaluating ACH and credit card acceptance, testing a smart invoicing solution, or asking whether its accounting software can integrate with a payment platform.
Taking action does not mean switching processors without a plan. It means gathering the information needed to make an informed decision.
Hem: The Merchant Who Refuses to Change
Hem is the business owner who says, “We have always used this processor, and I do not want to deal with changing it.”
Sometimes the concern is understandable. Changing payment systems can involve employee training, accounting workflows, customer payment information, and integration requirements.
But refusing to review the situation because change feels inconvenient can be costly. A business may continue paying more than necessary, manually performing tasks that could be automated, or offering fewer payment options than its customers prefer.
The biggest risk is not always choosing the wrong processor. It can be never evaluating whether the current processor is still right.
Haw: The Owner Who Learns to Adapt
Haw initially resists change but eventually realizes that remaining in the same place is not solving the problem.
In business, Haw is the owner who finally asks the accounting team to pull the last three months of processing statements. The company discovers that its payment mix has changed, its invoicing process is inefficient, and there may be opportunities to improve the way it gets paid.
The owner does not have to replace everything overnight. The company can begin with a review, identify the largest opportunities, and make changes in stages.
That is often the smartest way to approach payment modernization.
A Business Case: The Distributor That Outgrew Its Payment System
Consider a hypothetical industrial supply distributor processing $2 million per month in card payments.
The company originally chose a flat-rate provider because it wanted a simple, predictable solution. As the business grew, however, its payment mix shifted toward larger B2B transactions, corporate purchasing cards, and repeat commercial customers.
The company also began sending hundreds of invoices every month. Employees were manually emailing invoices, following up on overdue balances, recording payments, and reconciling transactions with the accounting system.
The owner had never seriously reviewed the payment operation because the company was profitable and the processor was functioning.
Then the CFO asked a different question:
“What would our payment operation look like if we designed it for the business we have today instead of the business we had ten years ago?”
That question changed the conversation.
The Cost of Keeping the Old Model
The CFO reviewed processing statements and discovered that the company was paying an effective card-processing rate of approximately 2.9%. The company also had significant manual billing costs and a growing accounts receivable balance.
For illustration, assume the business processes $2 million per month in cards:
Payment Scenario
Monthly Card Volume
Illustrative Effective Rate
Monthly Processing Cost
Existing arrangement
$2,000,000
2.90%
$58,000
Alternative arrangement
$2,000,000
2.45%
$49,000
Illustrative difference
0.45 percentage points
$9,000
That hypothetical difference represents $108,000 over twelve months.
These figures are illustrative, not a quote or savings guarantee. Actual processing costs depend on card mix, transaction size, interchange qualification, network fees, processor pricing, and other factors. A merchant should compare actual statements and proposals before making a decision.
The important lesson is that even a relatively small difference in effective processing cost can become meaningful as a business grows.
And processing fees are only one part of the equation.
The Bigger Opportunity: Changing How the Business Gets Paid
The distributor’s review revealed that payment processing was not just a cost center. It was connected to cash flow, customer experience, accounting efficiency, and working capital.
The company began evaluating a more complete payment strategy.
1. Review Pricing Instead of Assuming Flat Rate Is Always Best
Flat-rate processing can be convenient and appropriate for many businesses. It simplifies pricing and can be especially attractive to companies that value ease of setup and a straightforward operating model.
But as volume and transaction complexity increase, a business may benefit from comparing flat-rate pricing with interchange-plus or other customized arrangements.
Interchange-plus pricing separates the underlying interchange and network costs from the processor’s markup. This can provide greater transparency and may create opportunities for savings depending on the merchant’s transaction mix.
The right question is not, “Is flat rate bad?”
It is, “Which pricing structure makes the most sense for our actual business?”
2. Look at B2B Payment Optimization
A wholesale distributor may accept corporate purchasing cards, commercial cards, and other B2B payment types that have different interchange qualification requirements.
For eligible transactions, submitting the appropriate Level 2 or Level 3 data may help qualify for more favorable interchange categories. The data requirements and potential benefits depend on the card brand, card product, merchant category, transaction, and applicable network rules.
Nationwide Payment Systems works with B2B merchants to evaluate these opportunities and determine whether their payment environment can support the necessary data.
For a company processing large commercial transactions, this is worth reviewing rather than assuming every card transaction should be treated the same way.
3. Give Customers a Choice Between Cards and ACH
Some customers prefer paying by credit card because of rewards, convenience, or their own cash management needs. Others prefer ACH, particularly for larger invoices.
A modern B2B payment strategy should consider both.
Offering ACH alongside credit cards can give customers more flexibility and may help merchants manage acceptance costs. The economics depend on the ACH pricing arrangement, transaction amounts, return risk, and the merchant’s specific needs.
The goal is not to force every customer into one payment method. It is to make paying easier while giving the business more control over its payment costs.
4. Stop Treating Manual Invoicing as an Unavoidable Cost
The distributor’s accounting team was spending hours every week sending invoices, following up on balances, and matching payments to customer accounts.
That is another form of old cheese.
With NPSONE Smart Invoicing, businesses can create and send invoices, accept supported payment methods, automate recurring billing, and use payment links and reminders to streamline collections.
The platform can be used as a stand-alone solution or connected with supported accounting systems, including QuickBooks Online, Xero, and Sage Intacct. Businesses with custom software can also explore NPSONE API and webhook capabilities.
The objective is to reduce unnecessary manual work and make it easier for customers to pay.
5. Remember That Cash Flow Has a Cost
A business can be profitable on paper and still struggle with cash flow because customers take too long to pay.
Suppose the distributor has $1 million in average accounts receivable and improves its collection cycle enough to reduce that balance by $200,000. That is $200,000 less tied up in unpaid invoices.
The actual financial benefit depends on the company’s financing costs, cash needs, and operating circumstances, but the principle is straightforward: money collected sooner can be used to purchase inventory, pay employees, reduce borrowing, or invest in growth.
As I often tell business owners, do not become the bank for your customers. They already have a bank—and many of them have a credit card.
Offering convenient payment options, deposits, scheduled payments, and automated reminders can help businesses establish clearer payment expectations and improve collections.
Use our Cash Flow Calculator to explore how changes in collection timing may affect your business. (Replace this link with the exact calculator URL before publishing.)
Not Every Business Needs to Move Its Cheese
One of the most important lessons is that change should be purposeful.
A small retailer processing $15,000 a month may be perfectly satisfied with a simple flat-rate solution. A restaurant may prioritize reliable point-of-sale technology and fast support. A software company may need embedded payments and API flexibility. A manufacturer may care most about large-ticket transactions, ACH, ERP integration, and automated accounts receivable.
There is no single payment solution that is best for every business.
The mistake is assuming that the solution you selected five or ten years ago is automatically the best solution today.
A good payment review should consider total processing cost, transaction mix, customer payment preferences, accounting workflows, integration requirements, support, risk, and the company’s growth plans.
What Happens When the Payment Stack Is Built Around the Wrong Assumptions?
This issue becomes even more important for software companies and growing businesses developing new systems.
A SaaS founder may choose a payment provider because it is easy to integrate during the early stages of development. That can be a practical decision. But as the platform grows, the founder may discover that payments could become a revenue stream, customers need more payment options, or the original integration does not support the desired business model.
The same principle applies to manufacturers and distributors implementing ERP systems. If payments are treated as an afterthought, the company may later discover that billing, reconciliation, and payment acceptance are disconnected.
It is often easier to evaluate the payment strategy before the entire workflow is built around it.
Nationwide Payment Systems works with SaaS companies, ISVs, and other technology partners that want to explore white-label payments, embedded payment capabilities, and custom integrations through NPSONE.
The opportunity is not simply to replace one processor with another. It is to consider how payments can support the company’s broader business model.
A Five-Step Payment Processing Review
Business owners do not need to make a major change without understanding the numbers. A practical review can begin with five steps.
First, collect recent processing statements. Review at least three months of activity, including volume, transaction counts, fees, chargebacks, and payment mix.
Second, calculate the effective processing rate. Divide total processing fees by total card volume for the same period. This provides a starting point, although a proper comparison should also account for differences in services, transaction types, and fee structures.
Third, examine the billing workflow. How many invoices are sent each month? How much time is spent on collections and reconciliation? How long does it take customers to pay?
Fourth, identify the business’s current needs. Consider ACH, B2B interchange optimization, recurring billing, accounting integrations, customer payment portals, API capabilities, and support requirements.
Fifth, compare the total value of the alternatives. Do not evaluate a processor solely on an advertised rate. Consider the complete cost of acceptance, operational efficiency, customer experience, implementation requirements, and the quality of support.
Sometimes the review will confirm that the current processor is still the right choice. Other times, it will reveal that the business has outgrown its original arrangement.
Either outcome is better than operating on assumptions.
The Real Lesson: Do Not Wait Until the Cheese Is Gone
Businesses often review payment processing only after something goes wrong. A processor raises fees, an account is disrupted, an integration stops working, or the accounting department becomes overwhelmed.
But the best time to evaluate your payment strategy is before a problem forces you to act.
As your business grows, ask whether your payment system is growing with it. Are you taking advantage of the payment methods your customers want? Are you reviewing your processing costs? Are you automating tasks that no longer need to be manual? Are you using payment data to make better financial decisions?
The goal is not to chase every new technology or change providers every year.
The goal is to remain adaptable.
The payment processor that helped you start your business may not be the one that helps you scale it.
Ready to Find Your New Cheese?
Nationwide Payment Systems helps businesses evaluate their payment processing, identify opportunities for improvement, and build payment solutions around the way they actually operate.
Whether you are a distributor, manufacturer, wholesaler, professional services company, or SaaS platform, we can review your current arrangement and discuss options such as customized processing, ACH, B2B payment optimization, NPSONE Smart Invoicing, and software integrations.
You do not have to change processors simply because someone tells you to. But you should know whether your current payment strategy is still the best fit for your business.
Request a payment processing review with Nationwide Payment Systems and discover what your business may be missing.
Contact Nationwide Payment Systems.
